My design not only is it self sustaining under its our power when not in use, it can also be used to power anything due to it oscillating ac current. My design also allow me to use the plasma gases produce in conjunction with the engine I'm working on.
The generator in itself is a big step planes, spaceship and cars etc. fuel will no longer be a problem and when I finish the thruster that's limitless space you hear people saying will get to mars by 2020 and that's if technology hold up a decent pace of development and the government doesn't step in
The sad thing is as I was doing the research and reading over many thesis papers and wiki's. Most this technology is already here just not being used correctly. Solving the energy storage that took me some time due to I had to design a proper confinement to hold it. I design it to work as a 2-way system.
Prototype reactor PS
-
Chris Bradley
- Posts: 2930
- Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 7:05 am
- Real name:
Re: Prototype reactor PS
So, how do you say this thing generates energy? The beam fusion you are describing will consume more power than it can ever generate, by several orders of magnitude. If you have a 'slim' knowledge of physics, as you say, then there is a steep learning curve ahead of you to understand why this is.
Would you agree you need to understand why I am making this statement first, before assuming what this idea will or won't do? Or do you think folks here with hundreds of man-years of combined physics and engineering knowledge know less than you to be able to judge the likely outcome of what you are proposing?
There are only two pieces of relevant advice you are likely to get here, at this stage of your deliberations -
a) go and do several months of reading-based research, and
b) build a fusor, the recipe of which is well-described here in enough detail to make it a straightforward engineering challenge for you, and in so doing you will come to understand the basics of vacuum, plasma, ion and electrical field behaviour to help you make sound, physically realistic, next steps in your own idea.
"(b)" will not slow you down in your route to your own experiment. On the contrary, by having a focus you will probably accumulate all the equipment you'll need for later developments quicker than going from scratch with a completely new experiment.
I'm not sure I should be drawing this thread on, because I think we all know where it is going. So I'll let you figure out these things for yourself.
Would you agree you need to understand why I am making this statement first, before assuming what this idea will or won't do? Or do you think folks here with hundreds of man-years of combined physics and engineering knowledge know less than you to be able to judge the likely outcome of what you are proposing?
There are only two pieces of relevant advice you are likely to get here, at this stage of your deliberations -
a) go and do several months of reading-based research, and
b) build a fusor, the recipe of which is well-described here in enough detail to make it a straightforward engineering challenge for you, and in so doing you will come to understand the basics of vacuum, plasma, ion and electrical field behaviour to help you make sound, physically realistic, next steps in your own idea.
"(b)" will not slow you down in your route to your own experiment. On the contrary, by having a focus you will probably accumulate all the equipment you'll need for later developments quicker than going from scratch with a completely new experiment.
I'm not sure I should be drawing this thread on, because I think we all know where it is going. So I'll let you figure out these things for yourself.
-
Carl Willis
- Posts: 2841
- Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2001 7:33 pm
- Real name: Carl Willis
- Location: Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA
- Contact:
Re: Prototype reactor PS
I will likely be closing this thread tonight unless it goes somewhere useful before then.
As our Posting Guidelines clearly state, references to "ideas that members intend to keep secret" are not welcome. Recruiting consultants to work on proprietary projects falls outside the scope of this forum as well.
-Carl
As our Posting Guidelines clearly state, references to "ideas that members intend to keep secret" are not welcome. Recruiting consultants to work on proprietary projects falls outside the scope of this forum as well.
-Carl
Re: Prototype reactor PS
I know you guys may think Im trolling which is fine. I've been doing research on this for 5 years. I think you have to know what you want to build and have a understanding of it before you build it. I'm not bashes any of you guys and I commend you all on the skills you have, but this site is for trying to make limitless energy through fusors am I right? I'm not sure this site see that sure it open source, but from a design aspect it not. I say this because when I look at your designs which are great concepts its a straight line that not self sustaining.
self sustaining only happens when your device can feed/power itself by its own means and not by a constant supply of high voltage from a outside source and till you can understand how "SS" works then and I say this in the nicest way your making really really high end light bulbs that use platinum filaments, deuterium gas and the vacuum chamber is the bulb
self sustaining only happens when your device can feed/power itself by its own means and not by a constant supply of high voltage from a outside source and till you can understand how "SS" works then and I say this in the nicest way your making really really high end light bulbs that use platinum filaments, deuterium gas and the vacuum chamber is the bulb
-
David D Speck MD
- Posts: 129
- Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2008 2:05 pm
- Real name: David D. Speck MD
- Location: Auburn, NY
Re: Prototype reactor PS
Emanuel,
Just be aware that, as is amply documented in this forum, a D-D fusion system that operates at even 1% of breakeven would produce a radiation flux rapidly fatal to the operator unless very heavily shielded.
Be sure to get your shielding in place before you get to self sustaining operation.
Dave
Just be aware that, as is amply documented in this forum, a D-D fusion system that operates at even 1% of breakeven would produce a radiation flux rapidly fatal to the operator unless very heavily shielded.
Be sure to get your shielding in place before you get to self sustaining operation.
Dave
-
Richard Hull
- Moderator
- Posts: 15023
- Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2001 9:44 am
- Real name: Richard Hull
Re: Prototype reactor PS
Chris is correct. You need to get your hands "dirty". Only with the doing will you come to realize the difficulties in doing fusion to any measurable level of output.
The microscopic few who have come here with big ideas about saving the world and doing self-sustained fusion and creating fusion based electricity AND who actually succeeded in doing fusion are just either no longer here (dreams died) or are now here with a better realization of what fusion is and its severe limitations in the doing.
As it appears there is no intent on the "doing" and no clear understanding of even what is posited, Carl might as well close this out.
Richard Hull
The microscopic few who have come here with big ideas about saving the world and doing self-sustained fusion and creating fusion based electricity AND who actually succeeded in doing fusion are just either no longer here (dreams died) or are now here with a better realization of what fusion is and its severe limitations in the doing.
As it appears there is no intent on the "doing" and no clear understanding of even what is posited, Carl might as well close this out.
Richard Hull
Progress may have been a good thing once, but it just went on too long. - Yogi Berra
Fusion is the energy of the future....and it always will be
The more complex the idea put forward by the poor amateur, the more likely it will never see embodiment
Fusion is the energy of the future....and it always will be
The more complex the idea put forward by the poor amateur, the more likely it will never see embodiment