Brainwave
-
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Thu Jul 23, 2015 11:32 am
- Real name: Tristan
Re: Brainwave
I am well aware of how fusion works tah.
This thread gets across my overall message even if some of the details are incorrect. D-D is an incredibly grainy energy source more so than any energy source we have ever used in the past.
So forcing it to release its energy gradually rather than in bursts is extremely energy inefficient.
This thread gets across my overall message even if some of the details are incorrect. D-D is an incredibly grainy energy source more so than any energy source we have ever used in the past.
So forcing it to release its energy gradually rather than in bursts is extremely energy inefficient.
Last edited by Tristan Beal on Mon Jul 27, 2015 12:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 810
- Joined: Sun Feb 01, 2004 8:02 pm
- Real name: Andrew Seltzman
- Contact:
Re: Brainwave
Yes, hydrogen has a research octane number, but it's irreverent for analyzing fuels for fusion use. The octane number, when used in internal combustion engine, determines the rated maximum compression ratio engine that a fuel can be used with before it will per-detonate during compression. This corresponds to the fuel's properties in a thermodynamic and chemical sense corresponding to the activation energy(temperature) required to spontaneously ignite.
In fusion uses, the reactions are entirely nuclear in origin with no hydrogen/hydrocarbon combustion (the term "burning plasma" is a euphemism for a self sustaining fusion reaction, it's not actually "burning" in the sense of reacting with oxygen). An equivalent figure of merit when analyzing a fusion fuel is it's cross section which determines it's reaction rate as a function of temperature (collision energy).
Look here under requirements:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_fusion
Edit: Dennis seems to have beat me to a similar answer while I was typing...
In fusion uses, the reactions are entirely nuclear in origin with no hydrogen/hydrocarbon combustion (the term "burning plasma" is a euphemism for a self sustaining fusion reaction, it's not actually "burning" in the sense of reacting with oxygen). An equivalent figure of merit when analyzing a fusion fuel is it's cross section which determines it's reaction rate as a function of temperature (collision energy).
Look here under requirements:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_fusion
Edit: Dennis seems to have beat me to a similar answer while I was typing...
Last edited by Andrew Seltzman on Mon Jul 27, 2015 12:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Andrew Seltzman
www.rtftechnologies.org
www.rtftechnologies.org
-
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Thu Jul 23, 2015 11:32 am
- Real name: Tristan
Re: Brainwave
^^Andrew Seltzman wrote:Yes, hydrogen has a research octane number, but it's irreverent for analyzing fuels for fusion use. The octane number, when used in internal combustion engine, determines the rated maximum compression ratio engine that a fuel can be used with before it will per-detonate during compression. This corresponds to the fuel's properties in a thermodynamic and chemical sense corresponding to the activation energy(temperature) required to spontaneously ignite.
In fusion uses, the reactions are entirely nuclear in origin with no hydrogen/hydrocarbon combustion (the term "burning plasma" is a euphemism for a self sustaining fusion reaction, it's not actually "burning" in the sense of reacting with oxygen). An equivalent figure of merit when analyzing a fusion fuel is it's cross section which determines it's reaction rate as a function of temperature (collision energy).
Look here under requirements:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_fusion
- Nick Peskosky
- Posts: 135
- Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2012 9:02 pm
- Real name: Nicholas Peskosky
- Location: San Diego, CA
Re: Brainwave
Dennis and Andrew beat me to de-muddying the waters between chemical and nuclear processes. You may understand Fusion Tristan, but your semantics within the scientific and engineering disciplines could use some refinement. Pulsed energy ("grainy" as you say) sources will always be difficult to capture and harness under the current power generation paradigm we use. Fusion energy has been in the research stages for over 60 years due to numerous physics and engineering challenges, not the least of which is a way to capture pulsed thermal/ion/neutron release in a way that translates to spinning a turbine connected to a generator (a square peg in a round hole). Ideally, we would like to release D-D fusion continuously but obviously in the near term scaling factors favor D-T reactors for this operation due to optimal cross section .
Nick Peskosky
NPeskosky@gmail.com
"The whole of science is nothing more than the refinement of everyday thinking." - Albert Einstein
NPeskosky@gmail.com
"The whole of science is nothing more than the refinement of everyday thinking." - Albert Einstein
-
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Thu Jul 23, 2015 11:32 am
- Real name: Tristan
Re: Brainwave
Robert Stienhaus has a pulsed fusion design he calls the Mini-Mike.
It basically uses a small ball of frozen D-T as the catalyst for D-D fusion. All of the tritium used can be recovered after the D-D fusion stage.
Because most off the energy is generated from D-D fusion you could use a 500MJ laser as the driver and it would still be profitable.
The pulsed design mean thats the D-D fusion can be done up agaist the walls of the reactor cavity because the high tempratures would only need to be maintained for a very short time period.
The pressure levels created during operation of the device would obviously be high but this is negated by having thick reactor walls and by setting off the D-T cryosphere in a vacuum.
The walls of the device could be cooled with either water or preferably molten salt to recover energy.
It basically uses a small ball of frozen D-T as the catalyst for D-D fusion. All of the tritium used can be recovered after the D-D fusion stage.
Because most off the energy is generated from D-D fusion you could use a 500MJ laser as the driver and it would still be profitable.
The pulsed design mean thats the D-D fusion can be done up agaist the walls of the reactor cavity because the high tempratures would only need to be maintained for a very short time period.
The pressure levels created during operation of the device would obviously be high but this is negated by having thick reactor walls and by setting off the D-T cryosphere in a vacuum.
The walls of the device could be cooled with either water or preferably molten salt to recover energy.
-
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Thu Jul 23, 2015 11:32 am
- Real name: Tristan
Re: Brainwave
How is recovering pulsed energy difficult? You could use a giant piston if you had to, thats the way we do it in engines.
- Andrew Robinson
- Moderator
- Posts: 688
- Joined: Sun Aug 11, 2013 1:54 am
- Real name: Andrew Robinson
- Location: Raleigh, North Carolina
- Contact:
Re: Brainwave
A Turbo Encabulator would work instead of a big piston.
I can wire anything directly into anything! I'm the professor!
-
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Thu Jul 23, 2015 11:32 am
- Real name: Tristan
Re: Brainwave
Well you can make fusion simple and cheap or complicated and expensive, upto you but I know how capitilism will vote.
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 2124
- Joined: Fri Jun 14, 2002 2:26 pm
- Real name: Frank Sanns
Re: Brainwave
Mr. Beal, please follow the rules and introduce yourself in the Intro forum. This is required.
I am also closing this thread as it has not gone in a useful technical direction.
I am also closing this thread as it has not gone in a useful technical direction.
Achiever's madness; when enough is still not enough. ---FS
We have to stop looking at the world through our physical eyes. The universe is NOT what we see. It is the quantum world that is real. The rest is just an electron illusion. ---FS
We have to stop looking at the world through our physical eyes. The universe is NOT what we see. It is the quantum world that is real. The rest is just an electron illusion. ---FS
- Richard Hull
- Moderator
- Posts: 15027
- Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2001 9:44 am
- Real name: Richard Hull
Re: Brainwave
I was in this one but am now out of it. Nothing mentioned here will actually happen and zero energy will come out of it that will ever make electricity. Just more "fusion wind" over the decks.
Richard Hull
Richard Hull
Progress may have been a good thing once, but it just went on too long. - Yogi Berra
Fusion is the energy of the future....and it always will be
The more complex the idea put forward by the poor amateur, the more likely it will never see embodiment
Fusion is the energy of the future....and it always will be
The more complex the idea put forward by the poor amateur, the more likely it will never see embodiment