Triple grid design at LANL
-
- Posts: 196
- Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2002 5:37 pm
- Real name:
Triple grid design at LANL
Is anyone here familiar with the method that Mark Pickrell at LANL has worked with? I believe the outermost grid is at +200V with the second at ground potential and the innermost at -100KV.
They claim to have actually done 10^10/sec.
I quote from:
"Novel Methods for Neutron-Induced-Gamma Detection of Land Mines and Buried Explosives"
"...Using internal funds, extensive plasma physics simulations have been run at LANL to explore
methods to increase the neutron yield. Using a fully kinetic, 1.5 dimension plasma code with full atomic physics, we
have developed an IEC design that can produce 1011 n/s. The underlying physics principals are straight-forward. In
order to increase the neutron yield, the density must be lowered below the Paschen breakdown limit. This operation
can be achieved using a novel triple-grid design. (Conventional IEC systems use only a single grid). The triple-grid
system decouples the plasma breakdown from the ion acceleration, thus obviating the Paschen limit...."
Mark M. Pickrell, NIS-5, MS E540, Los Alamos National Lab
http://www.uxocoe.brtrc.com/TechnicalReps/SD52.pdf
David Trimmell
They claim to have actually done 10^10/sec.
I quote from:
"Novel Methods for Neutron-Induced-Gamma Detection of Land Mines and Buried Explosives"
"...Using internal funds, extensive plasma physics simulations have been run at LANL to explore
methods to increase the neutron yield. Using a fully kinetic, 1.5 dimension plasma code with full atomic physics, we
have developed an IEC design that can produce 1011 n/s. The underlying physics principals are straight-forward. In
order to increase the neutron yield, the density must be lowered below the Paschen breakdown limit. This operation
can be achieved using a novel triple-grid design. (Conventional IEC systems use only a single grid). The triple-grid
system decouples the plasma breakdown from the ion acceleration, thus obviating the Paschen limit...."
Mark M. Pickrell, NIS-5, MS E540, Los Alamos National Lab
http://www.uxocoe.brtrc.com/TechnicalReps/SD52.pdf
David Trimmell
- Brian McDermott
- Posts: 682
- Joined: Wed May 28, 2003 6:28 pm
- Real name:
Re: Triple grid design at LANL
They are using the D-T reaction, which explains the higher neutron yields. The cross section for that reaction is usually higher that that of D-D for a given voltage.
Re: Triple grid design at LANL
Hi guys:
You may not realize this but Joe Zambelli of this forum did a tripple grid a few years ago and got good results.
You don't need computer code to tell you that you get better results at higher vacuum....better mean free path...faster the ions.
Pulse fusion in d-d easily surpasses 10^11 neutron on a 5 GW pulse "below the Paschen limit...{<1 millitor}". No special gas mixture needed. Heck IF we could run pure T-T the IEC would already be past breakthrough. But that is dreaming! The goverment will never allow a commercial process with the stuff ever. It is in too short a supply and crucial to defense.
Happy Fusoring!
Larry Leins
Fusor Tech
You may not realize this but Joe Zambelli of this forum did a tripple grid a few years ago and got good results.
You don't need computer code to tell you that you get better results at higher vacuum....better mean free path...faster the ions.
Pulse fusion in d-d easily surpasses 10^11 neutron on a 5 GW pulse "below the Paschen limit...{<1 millitor}". No special gas mixture needed. Heck IF we could run pure T-T the IEC would already be past breakthrough. But that is dreaming! The goverment will never allow a commercial process with the stuff ever. It is in too short a supply and crucial to defense.
Happy Fusoring!
Larry Leins
Fusor Tech
- Richard Hull
- Moderator
- Posts: 15037
- Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2001 9:44 am
- Real name: Richard Hull
Re: Triple grid design at LANL
Brian is correct. The D-T was the catch here. D-T mixture is good for a 10e3 expansion of a common fusor. As Jon Rosentiel has tickled 10e7 with his D-D fusor, give him some D-T and he would be at 10e10n/sec. So the LANL fusor is no great shake.
They have just effectively lowered the pressure allowing for a more complete recirculation of ions and hung in a couple of extra grids to get about a 5x or 10X improvement over the common fusor. Laudable, but a more complex operation with NRC licensable reactants.
Richard Hull
They have just effectively lowered the pressure allowing for a more complete recirculation of ions and hung in a couple of extra grids to get about a 5x or 10X improvement over the common fusor. Laudable, but a more complex operation with NRC licensable reactants.
Richard Hull
Progress may have been a good thing once, but it just went on too long. - Yogi Berra
Fusion is the energy of the future....and it always will be
The more complex the idea put forward by the poor amateur, the more likely it will never see embodiment
Fusion is the energy of the future....and it always will be
The more complex the idea put forward by the poor amateur, the more likely it will never see embodiment
-
- Posts: 196
- Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2002 5:37 pm
- Real name:
Re: Triple grid design at LANL
So, there is no way (as of yet) to do 10^10 Neutrons/sec. without NRC licensed material? I would be curious as to what people think the amateur community will be able to reach? What might be the absolute limit with D-D considering a less then Corp. or Gov. budget?
David Trimmell
David Trimmell
- Richard Hull
- Moderator
- Posts: 15037
- Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2001 9:44 am
- Real name: Richard Hull
Re: Triple grid design at LANL
With current designs and up to say 150,000 volts applied I would think 10e8 or even 10e9 would be possible. This would include pulsed systems averaged rates.
Pulsed systems might blast out many more neutrons per pulse, but the time ordered average would be no more than a CW fusor. This is at amateur levels, of course.
Richard Hull
Pulsed systems might blast out many more neutrons per pulse, but the time ordered average would be no more than a CW fusor. This is at amateur levels, of course.
Richard Hull
Progress may have been a good thing once, but it just went on too long. - Yogi Berra
Fusion is the energy of the future....and it always will be
The more complex the idea put forward by the poor amateur, the more likely it will never see embodiment
Fusion is the energy of the future....and it always will be
The more complex the idea put forward by the poor amateur, the more likely it will never see embodiment
- Adam Szendrey
- Posts: 1333
- Joined: Fri Mar 29, 2002 5:36 pm
- Real name: Adam Szendrey
- Location: Budapest, Hungary
Re: Triple grid design at LANL
Well, this is just another crazy idea...but i think a cylindrical grid could be made into a coil (flat or standing;essentially it would look like a tube coil but the tube in this case is transparent to the ions), resulting in a long spiral plasma string. Well? What do you think? (essentially it's like several donut grids placed ontop (standing coil) of eachother but the plasma string is not broken (several rings) but a continous spiral)
Adam
Adam
- Carl Willis
- Posts: 2841
- Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2001 7:33 pm
- Real name: Carl Willis
- Location: Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA
- Contact:
Re: Triple grid design at LANL
Adam,
The cylindrical geometry has been used before, I think most notably by a group led by K. N. Leung at LBL to produce a D-T source that I think has reached 10^14 n / s. [Look for his website for the lit. references, I cannot remember the details right now].
It has a number of advantages just due to the simplicity of the layout. For example, external magnets for improving ionization by electrons would be easier to implement; the cathode structure itself would be perhaps easier to fabricate, and there are other advantages regarding the construction.
A practical disadvantage is that you may need to support the cathode with a standoff at both its ends.
Someone should consider that geometry for their next fusor as an experiment. My second fusor, still in the works, is a 6" chamber with standard spherical cathode (I already have some made, that's why).
-Carl
The cylindrical geometry has been used before, I think most notably by a group led by K. N. Leung at LBL to produce a D-T source that I think has reached 10^14 n / s. [Look for his website for the lit. references, I cannot remember the details right now].
It has a number of advantages just due to the simplicity of the layout. For example, external magnets for improving ionization by electrons would be easier to implement; the cathode structure itself would be perhaps easier to fabricate, and there are other advantages regarding the construction.
A practical disadvantage is that you may need to support the cathode with a standoff at both its ends.
Someone should consider that geometry for their next fusor as an experiment. My second fusor, still in the works, is a 6" chamber with standard spherical cathode (I already have some made, that's why).
-Carl
- Carl Willis
- Posts: 2841
- Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2001 7:33 pm
- Real name: Carl Willis
- Location: Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA
- Contact:
Re: Triple grid design at LANL
Well, regarding my just-previous post, I'm mistaken in thinking that Leung's designs are of the IEC type. Nevertheless, they are interesting and some, especially the spherical design at the bottom of the page cited, have a lot of similarity to the Fusor.
Dr. Leung apparently produces ions in these sources with inductively-coupled RF discharges.
And, he's estimating over 10^12 n / sec D-D for some of the designs.
Here's the link:
http://www.lbl.gov/Tech-Transfer/techs/lbnl1764.html
-Carl
Dr. Leung apparently produces ions in these sources with inductively-coupled RF discharges.
And, he's estimating over 10^12 n / sec D-D for some of the designs.
Here's the link:
http://www.lbl.gov/Tech-Transfer/techs/lbnl1764.html
-Carl
Re: Triple grid design at LANL
Hi Carl:
Been there done that!
That was my first demo machine.
A helix diped into creamic clay bisque and fired makes an excellent electrode for RF excitation.
Happy Fusoring!
Larry Leins
Fusor tech
Been there done that!
That was my first demo machine.
A helix diped into creamic clay bisque and fired makes an excellent electrode for RF excitation.
Happy Fusoring!
Larry Leins
Fusor tech
-
- Posts: 62
- Joined: Sun Mar 30, 2003 3:42 am
- Real name:
Re: Triple grid design at LANL
larry how do i attach a picture like this?
Re: Triple grid design at LANL
below the enter text part of the reply window, you should see
Attachments :
Select a file to attach (from your hard disk) :
Easy as pie! mmmmm pie
Attachments :
Select a file to attach (from your hard disk) :
Easy as pie! mmmmm pie
- Adam Szendrey
- Posts: 1333
- Joined: Fri Mar 29, 2002 5:36 pm
- Real name: Adam Szendrey
- Location: Budapest, Hungary
Re: Triple grid design at LANL
Carl,
I think i was not clear. I know that the cylindrical grid is an old thing, i proposed it more than a year ago (then i came to know that it is in the Hirsch patent, and that others have used it, then i came up with the toroid grid but that wasn't really new either).
What i propose now is a spiral of a cylinder, a tube coil, a coil of a tube. A cylinder wound up like the wire of a single layer coil, creating several turns. It's a bit hard to describe (though very simple). I'm posting a low-end drawing to show it. On the left is the wound up cylinder (cylindrical grid wound up; cut away view its a spiral not rings), and on the right is the shape of the plasma string forming (in theory). This is a standing coil.
Adam
I think i was not clear. I know that the cylindrical grid is an old thing, i proposed it more than a year ago (then i came to know that it is in the Hirsch patent, and that others have used it, then i came up with the toroid grid but that wasn't really new either).
What i propose now is a spiral of a cylinder, a tube coil, a coil of a tube. A cylinder wound up like the wire of a single layer coil, creating several turns. It's a bit hard to describe (though very simple). I'm posting a low-end drawing to show it. On the left is the wound up cylinder (cylindrical grid wound up; cut away view its a spiral not rings), and on the right is the shape of the plasma string forming (in theory). This is a standing coil.
Adam
- Attachments
-
- spiral.jpg (16.01 KiB) Viewed 3937 times
- Richard Hull
- Moderator
- Posts: 15037
- Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2001 9:44 am
- Real name: Richard Hull
Re: Triple grid design at LANL
I have images in hand of larger cylindrical Hirsch- Meeks grids from the 60s! Gene Meeks was in charge of testing them out and said they worked just fine. They never got a chance to push the envelope with them before ITT pulled the plug. So IEC cylindricals go back to at least 1963. Nothing new under the sun here.
A coil would, of course, make a fine cylindrical grid.
The cylinder might offer more reactant volume in a larger fusor, and 10e12 or even 10e14 isotropic emission might be possible with D-D if the reaction zone volume were beefed up along with the acceleration voltage. My 10e8-10e10 upper limit figure was for small, spherical amateur units where only the voltage was raised.
The sky is the limit in D-D if you have the money, space, input power and a willingness to go through them all with gusto.
Give me a boulder damn mains outlet, an old B-36 "peacemaker" aircraft hanger and a few hundred million and I'll give you D-D fusion flux levels that exceed that of a fission power reactor's core! It would still be only .0000001% efficient though.
Richard Hull
A coil would, of course, make a fine cylindrical grid.
The cylinder might offer more reactant volume in a larger fusor, and 10e12 or even 10e14 isotropic emission might be possible with D-D if the reaction zone volume were beefed up along with the acceleration voltage. My 10e8-10e10 upper limit figure was for small, spherical amateur units where only the voltage was raised.
The sky is the limit in D-D if you have the money, space, input power and a willingness to go through them all with gusto.
Give me a boulder damn mains outlet, an old B-36 "peacemaker" aircraft hanger and a few hundred million and I'll give you D-D fusion flux levels that exceed that of a fission power reactor's core! It would still be only .0000001% efficient though.
Richard Hull
Progress may have been a good thing once, but it just went on too long. - Yogi Berra
Fusion is the energy of the future....and it always will be
The more complex the idea put forward by the poor amateur, the more likely it will never see embodiment
Fusion is the energy of the future....and it always will be
The more complex the idea put forward by the poor amateur, the more likely it will never see embodiment
- Adam Szendrey
- Posts: 1333
- Joined: Fri Mar 29, 2002 5:36 pm
- Real name: Adam Szendrey
- Location: Budapest, Hungary
Re: Triple grid design at LANL
I was thinking of winding up the cylinder, because it will work like a long straight cylinder, but consumes a LOT less space. Using such a grid system a plasma string (in spiral shape) as long as several meters can be contained in a less then a meter long half meter diameter chamber, and that would mean a lot of plasma in a small space.
Even in a bell jar that is for eg. 30 cm high and 20 cm in diamater could contain at least a meter of such a plasma spiral.
Apart from this there is nothing new in the design.
Adam
Even in a bell jar that is for eg. 30 cm high and 20 cm in diamater could contain at least a meter of such a plasma spiral.
Apart from this there is nothing new in the design.
Adam