No news is no news.

Reflections on fusion history, current events, and predictions for the 'fusion powered future.
Post Reply
User avatar
Richard Hull
Moderator
Posts: 14992
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2001 9:44 am
Real name: Richard Hull

No news is no news.

Post by Richard Hull »

I spent a while poking around the Polywell related sites and I noted that EMC Squared has not posted much of anything since 2010 and most of their proof and paper work is in the 2006-2008 time frame. Otherwise, a 2010 effort at diagnostics seems to be it.

Bussard's final effort is certainly not dead, but may be on life support. I sense that this effort is adrift due to cash issues. Of course, many claims and plans are touted on the home page.

Mark Suppes gave a recent talk on his efforts and that's about it. Other sites and web infomercials claim that small, home science will be source of the fusion breakthrough needed. This stuff is put out there, of course, by non-hackers and folks who don't pack th' gear needed to do any heavy lifting.

P-B11 fusion still languishes as some dream, raising the fusion background noise level, despite its extreme difficulties at the "doing" level. There appears to be 0.0 folks involved in any, even cursory, P-B11 effort.

No one would give this difficult reaction a second look were it not for the aneutronic and supposed "clean" reaction that also holds out the carrot of direct conversion.

The NIF fusion effort is effectively shut down by decree and it is off doing what it was designed to do. (Make better bombs) It's ICF carrot fell off its string with the realization that putt-putt boat fusion will not a watt of usable electricity make.

ITER is still off in the distance and rather quiet, save for an occasional press blurb.

Of course, we are also still plodding along doing fusion at will, welcoming new cadres of doers who will mostly move on to other efforts whether successful or not. We are fusioneers, but just without the bold fusion claims, big fusion dreams, over-sold promises or a regular drum beat of press releases.

So, no news is not good news or bad news......It's just no news.

Richard Hull
Progress may have been a good thing once, but it just went on too long. - Yogi Berra
Fusion is the energy of the future....and it always will be
The more complex the idea put forward by the poor amateur, the more likely it will never see embodiment
Richard Hester
Posts: 1519
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2001 12:07 am
Real name:

Re: No news is no news.

Post by Richard Hester »

I dunno - rather than trying to leap all the way to a Boron-fueled Polywell, an interesting first step might be a modest beam-target setup in order to put together the capability to detect the P-B11 reaction. A detector similar to that used by the U. Wisconsin group to detect the D-He3 reaction may be suitable (PIPS detector with 1 mil (0.001") thick lead foil). They use this to detect the high-energy protons from the D-He3 reaction. The lead foil may need to be thinner in the case of the alpha particles. Its main purpose appears to be to screen out electrons. A drift tube and a magnet may do the same without attenuating the alpha particles.
User avatar
Richard Hull
Moderator
Posts: 14992
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2001 9:44 am
Real name: Richard Hull

Re: No news is no news.

Post by Richard Hull »

Without trying to detail construction methodologies in the news forum, Richard is correct, the PIPS hooked up to an MCA is the detection method of choice if one is well-heeled or lucky enough to have the setup.

I also agree that a target machine is certainly the quickest amateur way to P-B11 if that is their goal, but the needed 100kv + and the attendent x-radiation would be the fly in this ointment.

Richard Hull
Progress may have been a good thing once, but it just went on too long. - Yogi Berra
Fusion is the energy of the future....and it always will be
The more complex the idea put forward by the poor amateur, the more likely it will never see embodiment
chad ramey
Posts: 107
Joined: Tue Apr 28, 2009 10:45 pm
Real name: Chad Ramey
Location: Georgia
Contact:

Re: No news is no news.

Post by chad ramey »

I was really happy to catch wind of some of EMC squared's latest work while I was at NASA JSC. I met several times with a few of the guys from the EP division (the group that researches advanced propulsion technologies, most recently famed for Sonny's space warp field drive http://news.discovery.com/space/history ... 120917.htm) and during one of our meetings we talked for a while about my fusor. While on the subject of IEC one of the engineers said something along the lines of "you'll probably be interested in this" and proceeded to show me a presentation about NASA's current research into p-B11 fusion and what they knew about polywell. Apparently EMC squared is now being almost exclusively funded by the US Navy and most everything is being kept quiet for "security reasons".


I realize this is not the most credible news ever but, that is what I've heard. Maybe we'll see something from EMC squared totally out of the blue in another.....20 years or so.

-Chad
User avatar
Richard Hull
Moderator
Posts: 14992
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2001 9:44 am
Real name: Richard Hull

Re: No news is no news.

Post by Richard Hull »

It's nice to see that the Navy connection is still intact. 90% of all of Bussard's work was Navy funded for years via some nebulous, backdoor route. The Navy is always looking at the future and doesn't mind chasing down any number of possibilities. They also had a number of "out in the open" ONR contracts as well. No news here other than the Navy is still involved and like a stealth sub, they have slipped beneath the waves and are "silent running" for the moment.

Richard Hull
Progress may have been a good thing once, but it just went on too long. - Yogi Berra
Fusion is the energy of the future....and it always will be
The more complex the idea put forward by the poor amateur, the more likely it will never see embodiment
Richard Hester
Posts: 1519
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2001 12:07 am
Real name:

Re: No news is no news.

Post by Richard Hester »

On the P-B11 front, a gas-filled tube similar to the ancient X-ray tubes might be one way to get some results. I envision a Boron coated cathode and some sort of reservoir to maintain a low pressure of Hydrogen. This might be easier to manage than a full fledged accellerator. It would operate down in the low fringes of energy for the reaction, but the goal in this case is just to detect the reaction, not to generate power or irradiate the neighborhood.
Richard Hester
Posts: 1519
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2001 12:07 am
Real name:

Re: No news is no news.

Post by Richard Hester »

Taking the previous post to a logical conclusion, a fusor with a hydrogen fill and a boron coated solid inner grid/cathode would be a logical test bed.
Dan Tibbets
Posts: 578
Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2008 1:29 am
Real name:

Re: No news is no news.

Post by Dan Tibbets »

Lack of effort or at least preparatory work for P-B11 fusion is not absolute. Eric Learner, etel are working towards this goal with their Dense Plasma Focus. They are cash strapped and seem mired in the technical difficulties of this approach at this time. they have been open in their results, but not much has been heard in the last few months.

As For the Polywell approach by EMC2 they have been operating under a Naval contract for several years. Initially this was ~ 10 million dollars funded by the recovery act. As such there was required reporting of progress, and this has been almost the only outlet of information. But, these reports have been minimal and frustrating. Building of WB8 and testing has apparently progressed. One of the contract options was to go to a P-B11 version. The status of this is unknown. The only public news beyond the very minimal finical reports was that they were working on improved electron guns. Weather this was due to technical difficulties of injecting electrons, progress towards higher voltages for D-D fusion, or if it was in anticipation of P-B11 work is unknown. R. Nebel (of POPS fame)was chief scientist, but he left EMC2. He has not talked about any of the work since then, and I speculate that he is under non disclosure agreements as he had earlier been open about some of the work and expectations. Several others that have posted on this forum or the talk Polywell forum may also be under nondisclosure agreements. The significance of this is unknown.

Finally, Tri Alpha with their field Reversed Approach presumably has continued work, with P- B11 fusion being their stated goal. They have been funded by at least 50 million dollars. They are also keeping things close to their chest, though some related papers have been published.

At the last IEC conference there was a paper describing the P-B11 reaction and efforts to measure it. The results describe efforts to measure the energy of the resultant alpha particles. The distribution of the energy across the three product alphas seems to still be a uncertain issue.

Dan Tibbets
User avatar
Chris Bradley
Posts: 2930
Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 7:05 am
Real name:

Re: No news is no news.

Post by Chris Bradley »

... but there is plenty of 'fluff' news and other bling to keep things ticking over .. how about this video ..

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_-6hJ8sltdI
Richard Hester
Posts: 1519
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2001 12:07 am
Real name:

Re: No news is no news.

Post by Richard Hester »

All those other things are nice, but as far as an amateur attempt to demonstrate p-B11 fusion, an accellerator or modified fusor look to me to be the only affordable methods. A solid-target fusor would be far more managable than any attempt to get the boron into a fusor in gaseous form (and keep it that way). The boron would eventually end up on the chamber walls, or worse, the view port. Boron hydrides have been beaten to death elswhere on this forum - don't even go there. They are by turns unstable, pyrophoric, and exceedingly poisonous. No supplier in his right mind would sell any to an amateur. Boron halides are out for similar reasons, as well forming fluoride/chloride deposits on chamber walls. I have some SS fittings that have been used with halides - they ain't pretty.
User avatar
Richard Hull
Moderator
Posts: 14992
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2001 9:44 am
Real name: Richard Hull

Re: No news is no news.

Post by Richard Hull »

I was really excited by the video Chris supplied of ITER. I am given new confidence now related to fusion. Words, like "to serve as a test bed", " ...will be used to explore and test new ideas", "Attempt to examine how plasmas react in a controlled fusion environment", etc.,etc.

Sounds like JET and all the other "test beds" and "plasma study tokamaks" but of course this is much, much bigger and much, much more costly I think, perhaps its bigness is sufficent to make it a contender.

As always, it is just a matter of time and money, both of which, in future histories, may be shown to have been in short supply, related to surrounding events in the affairs of man.

Sometimes, I fear we are off to create a bold and fabulous future before we have fully secured and stabilized the present.

Richard Hull
Progress may have been a good thing once, but it just went on too long. - Yogi Berra
Fusion is the energy of the future....and it always will be
The more complex the idea put forward by the poor amateur, the more likely it will never see embodiment
DrMatthew
Posts: 6
Joined: Tue May 28, 2013 1:19 pm
Real name: Matt Moynihan

Re: No news is no news.

Post by DrMatthew »

Hello,

Just and update, in May there was 2 papers out. One on Fusors, one on Polywells. The Polywell work measured electron trapping inside a magnetic field. That might not sound like a big deal, but it is published evidence of electron trapping. That is big. The fusor work is no big deal. The amateurs here have done better work.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1063%2F1.4804279

http://link.springer.com/article/10.100 ... 013-9607-z
User avatar
Richard Hull
Moderator
Posts: 14992
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2001 9:44 am
Real name: Richard Hull

Re: No news is no news.

Post by Richard Hull »

Naturally, all the papers and data are for sale and not open for public review. Oh well...... We are not among the well heeled or the annointed.

I am stunned that the Turkish effort at 85kv was not able to make more neuts! They published before they learned how to properly run the thing!

Now, can the polywell, electron trap work and fuse at the same time?

Thanks for the update.

Richard Hull
Progress may have been a good thing once, but it just went on too long. - Yogi Berra
Fusion is the energy of the future....and it always will be
The more complex the idea put forward by the poor amateur, the more likely it will never see embodiment
Michael R Cole
Posts: 4
Joined: Thu Apr 10, 2014 1:06 pm
Real name: Michael R Cole

Re: No news is no news.

Post by Michael R Cole »

Well, one of your other problems is that the hydrogen boron-10 reaction acts as an expensive refrigerator. Isotope separation is one key. Perhaps somebody could couple a boron vaporizer ( requires intense electric arc or laser ) + calutron to do isotope separation and then the calutron's B-11 output injects directly into the reactor.

Vaporizable boron compounds could be used to effect a fractional distillation but as some of you have pointed out things like borane are h#ll*tiously poisonous plus borane has 2 boron atoms.

Another problem is the possibility of fusinghelium-4 to B-10 to get nitrogen - never computed if this could produce energy and my CRC handbook of chemistry and physics is buried in storage. Also, nitrogen of sufficient energy will alloy with metals and is one of the things ( in the form of cyanides ) to case harden steel.
User avatar
Adam Szendrey
Posts: 1333
Joined: Fri Mar 29, 2002 5:36 pm
Real name: Adam Szendrey
Location: Budapest, Hungary

Re: No news is no news.

Post by Adam Szendrey »

I think this is related to this discussion. I had some exchange back in 2011 with Dr. Nebel about POPS. I was working for the hungarian academy of science, and was involved in MEMS and other micro/nanotechnology stuff. I had an idea that could've potentially make use of the POPS concept on a microscale, and we had the facilities to develop something like that. He was interested and proposed that we keep in touch. Unfortunately shortly after I left that post, for financial reasons (government wages are very low here and I have a mortgage), so I couldn't make good on my ideas...usual story I know. I do regret that...

At any rate I believe he went on to establish his own lab, he was in the process of doing that in 2011, but I don't know what happened after that. The reason for this was not related to technical results, but to the fact that the DOE pretty much shut everything down that was not tokamak or otherwise magnetic related. Haven't heard from him since.

As for EMC2 in general...I'd really like to know what became of their project, but for quite a while now their site went "dark". There is a bit (very little substance) of information on wikipedia about their 2014 fiscal year, but that's it.
User avatar
Richard Hull
Moderator
Posts: 14992
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2001 9:44 am
Real name: Richard Hull

Re: No news is no news.

Post by Richard Hull »

I thought EMC2 more or less folded up with Doc Bussard. The Navy wrapped up its first part under EMC2 and I think the effort may be continuing in a limited way. EMC2 just got a new naval contract award!!!

https://www.fpds.gov/ezsearch/search.do ... Name=1.4.3

Based on just the 2014 awards they got just under a million bucks!

Richard Hull
Progress may have been a good thing once, but it just went on too long. - Yogi Berra
Fusion is the energy of the future....and it always will be
The more complex the idea put forward by the poor amateur, the more likely it will never see embodiment
User avatar
Adam Szendrey
Posts: 1333
Joined: Fri Mar 29, 2002 5:36 pm
Real name: Adam Szendrey
Location: Budapest, Hungary

Re: No news is no news.

Post by Adam Szendrey »

Aye, they still get funding but...while before there was at least some information on their website (http://www.emc2.com) now (I think at least for a year or two now) it's gone. It would be nice to know more details.

Wikipedia has this on the matter:
"In June 2014, EMC2 demonstrated for the first time that the electron cloud becomes diamagnetic in the center of a magnetic cusp configuration when beta is high, resolving an earlier conjecture.[18][27] Whether the electrons are thermalized and the plasma is thermal or not remains to be demonstrated experimentally.

After $12 to $20 million received from the U.S. Navy, EMC2 is now attempting to raise money in the private sector. CEO Jaeyoung Park gave a talk about their latest cusp-confinement experiments at UC Irvine.[95] EMC2 is planning a three-year, $30 million commercial research program to prove the Polywell can work as a nuclear fusion power generator.[96]"

A bit of the "same old same old" ?
User avatar
Chris Bradley
Posts: 2930
Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 7:05 am
Real name:

Re: No news is no news.

Post by Chris Bradley »

Under a recovery act funded project, following 'sole-supplier' USN funded work, EMC have demonstrated cusp confinement of electrons. This is a pre-requisite for the wiffleball theory of operation.

Though there is as yet nothing to show that the formation of the electron wiffle ball can lead to viable fusion, nonetheless some folks seem to think it suggests it still shows potential.

Me, I think the whole idea of Bussard was that tokamak was a bondoogle costing $millions and taking decades to show nothing much of direct relevance fusion power, and that polywell would fix that if only it got the funding. Well, it got the funding and now IT is the bondoogle costing $millions and taking decades to show nothing much of direct relevance to fusion power!

Fusion research has been supplanted by plasma research, and it has been this way from its very early days of fusion research. 'If only we could understand this troublesome plasma stuff' and so plasma experiments are the order of the day. Funnily enough, though, all that plasma research has produced a revolution in manufacturing techniques that might well not have happened without it. Has fusion research failed to pay for itself? Well, it hasn't paid off in direct research terms, but can real research ever a 'direct' contributor to industrial output? (I say 'no', that is the task of 'development'.) I think plasma research to date has produced many off-shoots that would probably not have happened without it, or accelerated with it at least, and the profit from which are multiples of the investments made.

But that doesn't necessarily mean dead ends should still be followed, simply the difficulty is knowing whether you are following a dead end until you get to the dead end.
Dan Tibbets
Posts: 578
Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2008 1:29 am
Real name:

Re: No news is no news.

Post by Dan Tibbets »

Actual EMC2 results are sparsely reported, but there has been recent presentations by Dr Parks that shows the best evidence of actual Wiffleball formation- high Beta conditions where the cusp confinement of electrons is greatly enhanced. According to Dr Nebel and others this is the most important aspect that required confirmation for the Polywell concept to be viable, The high Beta - diamagnetic conditions have actually been postulated as early as 1955, but this is apparently the first experimental confirmation of it's application. Bussard had claimed earlier demonstration of high Beta, but the results were apparently problematic. Not so with this latest result.

My impression is that this latest result was accomplished by Dr Parks with a clever experiment using the meager funds available. Apparently very good cusp confinement results were obtained with WB8, but demonstrating enhanced confinement beyond the basic low Beta conditions was tentative and not conclusive. The basic problem seemed to be that they found that they needed much more powerful electron guns to drive the progression from low to high beta. They could not afford this on their meagar budget, so Parks designed a smaller machine that required corresponding lower electron injection capacity, combined with supplemental high power plasma pulsed input to achieve high Beta (~ 0.7). The diagnostics to detect X-ray output demonstrated attainment of the target in what appears to be an undeniable fashion.

Navy funding for EMC2 has ended and EMC2 is now seeking other funding. The "millions" spent has been extremely small. Over the years the Navy spending has averaged ~ 1 million per year, and this last ~ 6 year funding through Recovery Act sources- managed through the Navy has averaged ~ 2 million per year. This is not much money to manage and maintain a ~ 6-8 person lab, yet alone allow for much capital expenditures. Comparatively DPF by Learner, etel has struggled along on a few hundred thousand per year. General Fusion and Tri Alpha has had perhaps ~ 5 million per year budgets. Other FRC efforts also have struggled on a few million per year- in part through Tokamak budgets for plasma injection. Contrast this with the US budget for tokamak research at ~ 200 million per year currently and more in the past.These three approaches, four including the General Fusion Canadian effort, all have well reasoned physics backing them up. With the latest EMC2 results the physics basis is arguably as strong as in the Tokamak. The actual attainment of profitable fusion is still a problematic goal , though perhaps engineering issues are the major challenges. As Bussard liked to say, the physics has been proven.

Some would say ~30 million spent on Polywell over ~ 30 years is considerable, but it is actually tiny. Polywell research has trickled along with ~ 30 million years of funding. Tokamak has staggered forward with ~ 2 billion per year (guesstimate for World funding) for ~ 50 years or ~ 100 billion years of funding.

The Tokamak is more advanced towards break even, as is Laser confinement fusion, but at costs ~ 1000 times higher per milestone achieved. This combined with the demonstrated economic disaster of actually deploying such technology begs the question of why much cheaper, yet reasonable efforts with much better economic application characteristics are minimized and even suppressed.

The perhaps most recent presentation by Dr Parks is here:

http://fire.pppl.gov/FPA14_IECM_EMC2_Park.pdf


Dan Tibbets
User avatar
Chris Bradley
Posts: 2930
Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 7:05 am
Real name:

Re: No news is no news.

Post by Chris Bradley »

Dan Tibbets wrote:Actual EMC2 results are sparsely reported, but there has been recent presentations by Dr Parks that shows the best evidence of actual Wiffleball formation- high Beta conditions where the cusp confinement of electrons is greatly enhanced. According to Dr Nebel and others this is the most important aspect that required confirmation for the Polywell concept to be viable,
He can say that, but there is not a shred of scientific support I am aware of for such a hypothesis. Lots of hyperbole and optimistically biased analyses perhaps, but nothing particularly objective. Analyses need to consider the worst possible outcomes, and these sorts of examinations only analyse the most favourable possible of circumstances, to the exclusion of anything that is unhelpful.

I am quite confident that the diamagnetic wiffleball of electrons has now been demonstrated satisfactorily, but this is zip zero evidence that they can confine fast ions. Tokamak can also demonstrate strong plasma confinement, and did so much earlier in its evolution that Bussard ever could, but decades later it still looks pretty poor at confining the plasma once it gets to thermonuclear temperatures during actual fusion, and its been trying a lot longer and with an order of magnitude or more funding.

These 'we only have to show X' claims are EXACTLY like all the flannel back in the 60's with toroidal plasma. All we have to do is X .. "and then there is a miracle"....

Well, I suppose it is Christmas when miracles happen - Happy Christmas all!!
Dan Tibbets
Posts: 578
Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2008 1:29 am
Real name:

Re: No news is no news.

Post by Dan Tibbets »

You mention fast ion confinement. Certainly that is a key. If you look at the link, there is a claim that is obtained by the report of deep potential wells demonstrated as early as 1995, Take it as you will. the demonstration of high Beta operation as first postulated by Grad in 1955 has been The Major Physics issue that had to be demonstrated for Polywell viability. It certainly is not a magic bullet that guarantees a workable solution, but it is a counter to arguments that such a major road block was insurmountable.

Dan Tibbets
User avatar
Richard Hull
Moderator
Posts: 14992
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2001 9:44 am
Real name: Richard Hull

Re: No news is no news.

Post by Richard Hull »

I have every confidence that with each major hurdle that is said to be conquered, a new one will be found, ad infinitum.

Richard Hull
Progress may have been a good thing once, but it just went on too long. - Yogi Berra
Fusion is the energy of the future....and it always will be
The more complex the idea put forward by the poor amateur, the more likely it will never see embodiment
Post Reply

Return to “Fusion --- Past, Present, and Future”