Page 1 of 1

Good evening from Maisons-Alfort

Posted: Wed Jul 04, 2018 5:20 pm
by Patrick Lindecker
Hello to all,

Here is my presentation.

My name is Patrick Lindecker and I'm almost 63 years old.
I'm from Maisons-Alfort (near Paris) in France.
I'm retired since 2017 and I love this new life!
I worked as generalist engineer during 36 years in FRAMATOME (design and erection of nuclear fission plants), in different jobs.
I'm also radioamateur (F6CTE) and if I'm not a DXer, I develop decoding programs for Hams and SWL (Multipsk ...),
this to say that I like developing scientific programs (included for fusion).
I'm fascinated by fusion energy (and moreover fusion propulsion).

Enough for today
Patrick

Re: Good evening from Maisons-Alfort

Posted: Thu Jul 05, 2018 1:10 am
by John Futter
Welcome Patrick
you will find at the top of each sub forum on this site the FAQ section
a wealth of information there
you are lucky to be retired I'm in New Zealand and have 3 years to run to 65 when I might first be able to retire
And I also work in a similar nuclear indusrty allthough we are supposed to be Nuclear free
www.gns.cri.nz
I am also an Amateur Radio operator ZL2XRF AKA ZL2TUD I do have a page on QRZ.com

Re: Good evening from Maisons-Alfort

Posted: Thu Jul 05, 2018 4:00 pm
by Patrick Lindecker
Hello John,

>you will find at the top of each sub forum on this site the FAQ section
RR

>you are lucky to be retired I'm in New Zealand and have 3 years to run to 65 when I might first be able to retire
Yes it is a chance to have all the time you need. The legal age is also 65 years old here, but you can retire down to 62 or even 60, but on conditions .

>I am also an Amateur Radio operator ZL2XRF AKA ZL2TUD I do have a page on QRZ.com
I see, on QRZ, that you are in a nice place in NZ. I might update my QRZ info HI

73
Patrick

Re: Good evening from Maisons-Alfort

Posted: Fri Jul 06, 2018 5:30 am
by Richard Hull
Welcome Patrick. As a rule, we suggest never re-quoting text that has appeared in an earlier part of a posted thread as every one has read it. It clutters replies and makes them needlessly tedious and boring to people who have already just read the re-quote.

Richard Hull