Scientific American (Jun '12); Article on ITER.
- Chris Bradley
- Posts: 2930
- Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 7:05 am
- Real name:
Scientific American (Jun '12); Article on ITER.
Not sure they should really have copyrighted pages on their website - maybe best read it before it gets pulled (if of any interest!...)
http://www.iter.org/doc/www/content/com ... %20(2).pdf
(copy the link rather than click - the last ').pdf' characters seem to go missing)
- Richard Hull
- Moderator
- Posts: 15037
- Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2001 9:44 am
- Real name: Richard Hull
Re: Scientific American (Jun '12); Article on ITER.
Would not load for me even with a copy and the adding of the ").pdf"
Anything worth mentioning?
Richard Hull
Anything worth mentioning?
Richard Hull
Progress may have been a good thing once, but it just went on too long. - Yogi Berra
Fusion is the energy of the future....and it always will be
The more complex the idea put forward by the poor amateur, the more likely it will never see embodiment
Fusion is the energy of the future....and it always will be
The more complex the idea put forward by the poor amateur, the more likely it will never see embodiment
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 551
- Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 9:08 pm
- Real name:
Re: Scientific American (Jun '12); Article on ITER.
Works for me right now.
Tyler
Tyler
Re: Scientific American (Jun '12); Article on ITER.
A cold analysis therefore says the direction for fusion power MUST focus on mitigating and/or replacing those EM and thermalisation/ ionisation losses, not in looking for ways to ramp up the actual nuclear fusing process - that's a done-deal.
Certkiller http://www.cert-killer.me
-
- Posts: 156
- Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2012 9:19 pm
- Real name: Doug Browning
Re: Scientific American (Jun '12); Article on ITER.
I wonder how long it will sit on Ebay someday with "Make an offer".