Scientific American (Jun '12); Article on ITER.

Reflections on fusion history, current events, and predictions for the 'fusion powered future.
Post Reply
User avatar
Chris Bradley
Posts: 2930
Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 7:05 am
Real name:

Scientific American (Jun '12); Article on ITER.

Post by Chris Bradley »


Not sure they should really have copyrighted pages on their website - maybe best read it before it gets pulled (if of any interest!...)

http://www.iter.org/doc/www/content/com ... %20(2).pdf

(copy the link rather than click - the last ').pdf' characters seem to go missing)
User avatar
Richard Hull
Moderator
Posts: 14991
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2001 9:44 am
Real name: Richard Hull

Re: Scientific American (Jun '12); Article on ITER.

Post by Richard Hull »

Would not load for me even with a copy and the adding of the ").pdf"

Anything worth mentioning?

Richard Hull
Progress may have been a good thing once, but it just went on too long. - Yogi Berra
Fusion is the energy of the future....and it always will be
The more complex the idea put forward by the poor amateur, the more likely it will never see embodiment
Tyler Christensen
Site Admin
Posts: 551
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 9:08 pm
Real name:

Re: Scientific American (Jun '12); Article on ITER.

Post by Tyler Christensen »

Works for me right now.

Tyler
erum90
Posts: 1
Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2013 4:11 am
Real name: erum

Re: Scientific American (Jun '12); Article on ITER.

Post by erum90 »

A cold analysis therefore says the direction for fusion power MUST focus on mitigating and/or replacing those EM and thermalisation/ ionisation losses, not in looking for ways to ramp up the actual nuclear fusing process - that's a done-deal.
Doug Browning
Posts: 156
Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2012 9:19 pm
Real name: Doug Browning

Re: Scientific American (Jun '12); Article on ITER.

Post by Doug Browning »

I wonder how long it will sit on Ebay someday with "Make an offer".
Post Reply

Return to “Fusion --- Past, Present, and Future”