Flow rate vs Neutron Production

For posts specifically relating to fusor design, construction, and operation.
Post Reply
User avatar
Bob Reite
Posts: 579
Joined: Sun Aug 25, 2013 9:03 pm
Real name: Bob Reite
Location: Wilkes Barre/Scranton area

Flow rate vs Neutron Production

Post by Bob Reite »

Now that I am getting respectable neutron numbers, I decided to try to plot flow rate vs neutron production while holding voltage, current and pressure constant. Actually I adjusted the pressure along with the power supply output to stay at 35 KV at 8 mA. The pressure was between 10 and 12 microns.

Code: Select all

Flow Rate in sccm  Isotopic Neutrons per second.
3.0 171,000
3.5 327,000
4.0 370,000
4.5 213,000
5.0 299,000
To see if I could do it again, I ran at 4.0 sccm a second time and got 412,000 neutrons per second.

My guess is, by flowing too fast, the dryer can't keep up with the flow, although in theory the PEM cells do not have water vapor in the gas output.

I'll have to repeat this experiment another time to see if the results are consistent. Has anyone else tried this experiment?

As a side note, once the lead shielding arrives so that I can operate above 35 KV safely, I'm going to try for the half mega-mark.
The more reactive the materials, the more spectacular the failures.
The testing isn't over until the prototype is destroyed.
User avatar
Richard Hull
Moderator
Posts: 15023
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2001 9:44 am
Real name: Richard Hull

Re: Flow rate vs Neutron Production

Post by Richard Hull »

You are in uncharted waters. No one has run a PEM cell or simple hydrolyzer with the measurment capabilities you have and reported such well defined data.

My guess is the cell can't keep up with the demand and or some water contamination is entering the system and the flow rate has the water vapor in it above a certain point.

I just wish you had an accurate pressure gauge your system as flow rates are not normally dealt with here. We have a much better feel for increasing pressures creating more and more fusion at specific voltages and currents.

Richard Hull
Progress may have been a good thing once, but it just went on too long. - Yogi Berra
Fusion is the energy of the future....and it always will be
The more complex the idea put forward by the poor amateur, the more likely it will never see embodiment
User avatar
Dennis P Brown
Posts: 3184
Joined: Sun May 20, 2012 10:46 am
Real name: Dennis Brown

Re: Flow rate vs Neutron Production

Post by Dennis P Brown »

Ideally, one would want the total system pressure to remain constant as flow rate is increased. Considering how little your pressure did change, it would appear your experiment did succeed in achieving that goal. It is rather telling that the current stayed/maintained constant with so small a pressure increase while the total flow rate increased so much - interesting.
User avatar
Bob Reite
Posts: 579
Joined: Sun Aug 25, 2013 9:03 pm
Real name: Bob Reite
Location: Wilkes Barre/Scranton area

Re: Flow rate vs Neutron Production

Post by Bob Reite »

I have an exhaust valve controller which keeps the pressure constant. If I increase the flow rate the exhaust valve opens more to allow the vacuum system to pump out the "excess" gas. I found that with my system the maximum flow rate is limited by how fast the vacuum system can pump out the gas to maintain a given pressure, not how fast the electrolyzer can make deuterium. The "raw" uncorrected reading does not vary more than 20 percent, as long as the pressure and power supply drive are adjusted to give 35 KV at 8 mA. Lower pressures causes the voltage to rise and the current to drop while higher pressures do the opposite.

At the lower flow rates, I can start with just a full vial of gas and not even operate the electrolyzer until the run is complete to prepare for the next run. At the faster flow rates I do have to run the electrolyzer while the gas is flowing so that I don't run out. I set up the system so that I can vary the electrolyzer current so that the output can be adjusted to match the demand.

I am keeping my eyes open for a 0.1 Torr full scale capacitance manometer so I can accurately measure chamber pressure without having to know the exact composition of the gas.
The more reactive the materials, the more spectacular the failures.
The testing isn't over until the prototype is destroyed.
Post Reply

Return to “Fusor Construction & Operation (& FAQs)”