Well, I was connecting to the net just to correct the post... but I have found you did it for me...
(You know there are a few hours that separate us, first post was at work in the morning, now it is 23:07)
In effect there are a few print errors on the article... And Ohms are replaced with watts, and in a measure uA has been substituted with mA... I read the article last night and was very tired, so I was not so critical when looking at it.
But I should have been. I was just too ingenuous...
What to say ? To good to be real :)
ciao Daniele
Created on Thursday, April 12, 2001 5:06 PM EDT by Daniele DB Bortoluzzi