In this space, visitors are invited to post any comments, questions, or skeptical observations about Philo T. Farnsworth's contributions to the field of Nuclear Fusion research.Subject: Re: Theory
Date: Aug 08, 0:08 am
Poster: BenOn Aug 08, 0:08 am, Ben wrote:
>While there are some people in this board that are either attempting or have made fusors, there is a much larger group that would like to make a fusor, but find it to difficult of a project just to make a fancy light bulb.
>I'm posting this because, I believe that posting theories about how to break even with a fusor is OK and I will argue with anyone that thinks it is not OK.
>
>So, I fired the first shot. Feel free to shoot back.>While there are some people in this board that are either attempting or have made fusors, there is a much larger group that would like to make a fusor, but find it to difficult of a project just to make a fancy light bulb.
I'm posting this because, I believe that posting theories about how to break even with a fusor is OK and I will argue with anyone that thinks it is not OK.
>So, I fired the first shot. Feel free to shoot back.
Well I don't think fusors of any kind will
be possible with all the "Secret operations"
being done. It is not wise to hide information
as is being done.
Secondly this is a hobby and as such it is the
old trial and error type of construction.Nobody
will get a PHD on home fusor theroies of operation
.(Or none that I know of).
Thirdly I don't know of any fusor models of operation,that one can calculate to contruct a fusor of better quality.
Forth and finaly, Even if you get Break even
you need a gain of about 4 or 5 to be practical.
Ben.
PS, But who knows until you try.
I can see it now... Radio Fusor
Hey this is realy crummy reception -- Music
hiss pop crackle more music... true but then you only have to replace the 00-FSR tubes evey 10,000 years and you never need batteries.
PPS. This message board needs a online spell
checker.
- Re: Theory - ??? Aug 08, 6:09 am