NWNC CR39 Project- Summary and Request to Active Fusioneers

It may be difficult to separate "theory" from "application," but let''s see if this helps facilitate the discussion.
Post Reply
Andrew Haynes
Posts: 90
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2012 1:25 am
Real name: Andrew Haynes

Re: NWNC CR39 Project- Summary and Request to Active Fusione

Post by Andrew Haynes »

" I think among the least plausible hypotheses is any suggestion that anisotropy in the nuclear reaction itself is responsible"
Why not?
Run your fuser with air, and see what the color is with a camera, if purple its magnetic ,electrical based and will follow mhd ,lenz principle with the instabilities.
Andrew Haynes
User avatar
Steven Sesselmann
Posts: 2128
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 9:50 pm
Real name: Steven Sesselmann
Location: Sydney - Australia
Contact:

Re: NWNC CR39 Project- Summary and Request to Active Fusione

Post by Steven Sesselmann »

How are the magnetic fields going to influence neutrons?

Steven
http://www.gammaspectacular.com - Gamma Spectrometry Systems
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Steven_Sesselmann - Various papers and patents on RG
Andrew Haynes
Posts: 90
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2012 1:25 am
Real name: Andrew Haynes

Re: NWNC CR39 Project- Summary and Request to Active Fusione

Post by Andrew Haynes »

"How are the magnetic fields going to influence neutrons?", Positivity charged ions that leave the center head towards the inner grid and fuse with incoming positively charged ions, what is positivity charged and what is not is the area of electrons, which make there own magnetic field by moving. Are you serious?
Yeah, were the source of fusion is happen is what I was meaning, not what happens after it has fused
Andrew Haynes
User avatar
Carl Willis
Posts: 2841
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2001 7:33 pm
Real name: Carl Willis
Location: Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA
Contact:

Re: NWNC CR39 Project- Summary and Request to Active Fusione

Post by Carl Willis »

Andy, I can't make any sense of what your argument is, nor how it relates to the thread's topic. Sorry.
Carl Willis
http://carlwillis.wordpress.com/
TEL: +1-505-412-3277
User avatar
Richard Hull
Moderator
Posts: 15039
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2001 9:44 am
Real name: Richard Hull

Re: NWNC CR39 Project- Summary and Request to Active Fusione

Post by Richard Hull »

Andy,

Individual D-D fusions, (the nuclear process), within any volume are statisitcally isotropic emitters. This is a well established fact. Externally measured neutron anisotropy related to this discussion is felt to be related to fusor system construction, operational peculiarities and surrounding structure scattering.

Richard Hull
Progress may have been a good thing once, but it just went on too long. - Yogi Berra
Fusion is the energy of the future....and it always will be
The more complex the idea put forward by the poor amateur, the more likely it will never see embodiment
Andrew Haynes
Posts: 90
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2012 1:25 am
Real name: Andrew Haynes

Re: NWNC CR39 Project- Summary and Request to Active Fusione

Post by Andrew Haynes »

Richard Hull , I take it that individual it is isotropic , but due to the grid nature(say fast speed closer to the wire) there will be more fusion reaction per volume in that area, if it all radiates isotropic there will be more in those areas.
Attachments
fuserefeild.PNG
Andrew Haynes
User avatar
Richard Hull
Moderator
Posts: 15039
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2001 9:44 am
Real name: Richard Hull

Re: NWNC CR39 Project- Summary and Request to Active Fusione

Post by Richard Hull »

My post states that clearly. Any anisotropy would be due to construction, operational issues and unequal scattering. So what is the big issue here. I also state that the fusor is not an isotropic source for all those reasons. D-D Fusion, itself, is always isotropic. Re-read my post.

Richard Hull
Progress may have been a good thing once, but it just went on too long. - Yogi Berra
Fusion is the energy of the future....and it always will be
The more complex the idea put forward by the poor amateur, the more likely it will never see embodiment
Post Reply

Return to “Fusor and/or General Fusion Theory (& FAQs)”