In this space, visitors are invited to post any comments, questions, or skeptical observations about Philo T. Farnsworth's contributions to the field of Nuclear Fusion research.Subject: Re: p + B11 reaction
Date: Feb 22, 11:53 am
Poster: Jim LuxOn Feb 22, 11:53 am, Jim Lux wrote:
While initially attractive because it is "a-neutronic" (that is, it doesn't give up neutrons which cause all sorts of problems), it has a very low cross section (which means it is hard to make it work), and, there are other reactions that will inevitably occur in the same reaction vessel that DO yield neutrons, so you haven't actually saved much hassle.
>Hi,
>I just found this message board. I'm just wondering what people here think of fusion using proton-Boron reaction, I think its
>
>p + B11 -> 3He4 + 8.4 MeV
>
>I orignally came across this in a paper by R. Bussard about his PolyWell IEC fusion reactor
- Re: p + B11 reaction - IJV
- Re: p + B11 reaction - Pierce Nichols Feb 22, 6:40 pm
- Re: p + B11 reaction - Richard Hull Feb 23, 11:02 am
- Re: p + B11 reaction - Pierce Nichols Feb 24, 10:57 pm
- Re: p + B11 reaction - Scott Stephens Feb 23, 1:50 pm
- Re: p + B11 reaction - Richard Hull Feb 23, 11:00 am
- Re: p + B11 reaction - Pierce Nichols
- Re: p + B11 reaction - IJV Mar 01, 11:36 pm
- Re: p + B11 reaction - Jim Lux
- Re: p + B11 reaction - IJV Mar 01, 11:35 pm
- Re: p + B11 reaction - IJV Feb 22, 9:07 pm
- Re: p + B11 reaction - Richard Hester Feb 23, 1:23 am
- Re: p + B11 reaction - Pierce Nichols Feb 24, 11:14 pm
- Re: p + B11 reaction - Scott Stephens Feb 23, 2:12 pm
- Re: p + B11 reaction - Pierce Nichols Feb 24, 11:15 pm
- Re: p + B11 reaction - Scott Stephens Feb 23, 1:53 pm
- Re: p + B11 reaction - Feb 23, 1:53 am
- Re: p + B11 reaction - Scott Stephens